For product designers and PMs
A wireframe exists to settle layout and flow before anybody argues about color. That is the hard part: the moment a screen looks finished, the review turns into a debate about corner radius instead of the path a person takes through the product.
Low fidelity that stays low fidelity. Stakeholders respond to what they see. A polished mockup collects feedback on type and spacing at the exact point you needed feedback on the structure.
Screens joined into a flow, not a folder of screens. A wireframe set only makes sense as a path: this tap goes there, that error comes back here, this state is the one nobody designed.
Review it live with the people who have opinions. A flow reviewed asynchronously generates more questions than it answers, because each reader invents a different path through it.
Iterate without losing the round everyone agreed on. The second version of a flow is an argument with the first one, so both have to survive.
A handoff that does not need a seat. The people who need the flow are in a ticket, a doc, or a chat thread, not in your canvas tool.
The hand-drawn feel is the default, so a screen reads as a sketch and the conversation stays on the flow. Sketch a rough rectangle and it comes back clean, which is enough structure to read as a screen without looking like a build.
Every screen sits on the same infinite canvas, so they live side by side with arrows carrying the flow between them. Lasso selection grabs a screen and its arrows in one scribbled loop when the order changes.
Real-time collaboration with live cursors, from a link: guests join and edit without an account, and cursor traffic is throttled so the board stays responsive with several people on it.
Version history is included on the free tier, so trying a different layout does not cost you the version the team already signed off. History stores what changed rather than whole-board snapshots, which is why stepping back is cheap.
Export to PNG or SVG for the ticket, or send a viewer link so the board is readable but nobody edits it by accident. Share links are end-to-end encrypted, and the .drawdy JSON export keeps the editable source.
Some of the work around wireframes and user flows belongs in another tool. Here is which parts, and where they go.
You need high-fidelity mockups, a shared component library, or a clickable prototype. Drawdy is the round before that one.
Use Figma or FigJam.
Your review runs on comment threads or voice inside the canvas. Drawdy has neither, and Excalidraw keeps both for its paid Plus tier.
Use Miro.
You sketch screens with an Apple Pencil on an iPad and want the best stylus feel in the category.
Use Apple Freeform.
FAQ
Not for design work. Figma is where high-fidelity screens, component libraries and prototypes belong. Drawdy covers the round before that: low-fidelity screens and the flow between them, drawn fast enough to change while the meeting is still running.
Not as threads. Drawdy has no comments, no voice and no screensharing, so review happens live on the board with cursors on screen, and notes go on the canvas as text. If threaded feedback is the point, Miro is the stronger tool.
No. A share link works without an account, and you decide whether the person arrives as an editor or a viewer. The board is encrypted in your browser before anything is uploaded, and the key travels in the URL fragment, which never reaches the server.
Yes. Version history is on the free tier, so you can step back to the layout you had before the last round of changes rather than keeping five copies of the board.
The canvas is open
Sketch a system, map a flow, or think it through with your team — no signup, no setup, just a canvas and a link to share.
Start drawing — it’s free